Lab 12 · Searching and Sorting
Module 12 · Lectures L23–L24 · Week 12 · 120 minutes · guided/independent 40/60
Prerequisites: completion of Labs 1–11 (Lab 1: none). Bring your laptop with the course toolchain verified (see § 3) and your exercise notebook.
2. Learning objectives
By the end of this lab you can:
- Implement linear and binary search with counters
- State binary search's precondition and invariant
- Trace selection and bubble sort with snapshots
- Compare costs with counted comparisons
These deliver the module's outcomes (PF codes in ../../LEARNING_OUTCOMES.md).
3. Required software and compiler
- Compiler contract:
g++ -std=c++17 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic(GCC 13+ via MSYS2/MinGW-w64 on Windows; GCC or clang++ on macOS/Linux — see ../../docs/TOOLCHAIN.md). - Editor: any (VS Code + C/C++ extension recommended; debugger optional until Lab 4).
- Verify before starting:
g++ --version
- Starter files for this lab live in
starter_code/next to this manual; they compile warning-free under the contract (see../../../docs/LAB_AUDIT.md).
4. Relevant theory
invariants, traced sorts, counted comparisons — full treatment in the lecture notes; the lab applies it, the lecture explains it.
5. Pre-lab questions
Answer in your notebook BEFORE the session; the TA checks them at entry:
- What breaks if binary search receives unsorted data?
- Which sort does NO work on sorted input?
- Roughly how many comparisons does binary search make for n = 1000?
6. Instructor demonstration (15 min)
The instructor or TA demonstrates: Search correctness, sort tracing, complexity intuition. Watch for the workflow (how errors are read and fixed), not just the final code. The demo ends with the checkpoints you must hit in § 7.
7. Guided coding tasks
- guided: linear search with comparison counter
- guided: selection sort snapshot trace on 6 elements
- independent: binary search with counters + absent keys
- independent: sort-then-search benchmark comparing counted costs
Checkpoint rule: show each guided result to the TA before moving on. TAs give guidance, not solutions (../../TEACHING_GUIDE.md § 5).
8. Independent programming exercises
Complete the tasks labeled independent in § 7 without step-by-step help. You may consult lecture notes and this manual — not a neighbor's screen. The TA records who completes what.
9. Debugging task
Binary search boundary bug (low < high vs <=) — diagnose and fix
Use the five-step debug loop (reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, test, fix-and-verify) and record it in your debug log (../../labs/resources/debug_log_template.md) from Lab 4 onward. Identify the stage of each defect (compile, link, runtime, logic).
10. Test cases
Your program must pass at minimum:
- Boundary values (0, 1, maximum legal input).
- Normal cases from the task descriptions.
- At least one invalid input handled gracefully (from Lab 4 onward).
Record results in the test-evidence table (../../labs/resources/submission_template.md): input, expected, actual, verdict.
11. Expected learning outcomes
After this lab, verified by the checkpoints and your submission, you can reliably implement linear and binary search with counters; state binary search's precondition and invariant; trace selection and bubble sort with snapshots; compare costs with counted comparisons. This maps to the module's PF outcomes and feeds the next lab's prerequisites.
12. Submission requirements
Submit via the course LMS before the start of next week's lab:
- Source file(s) named per the task list (snake_case).
- Test-evidence table (completed template).
- Debug log for the § 9 task (Lab 4 onward).
- Pre-lab answers (photo or scan is fine).
Code must compile warning-free under the course contract — a warning costs the compile check (§ 13).
13. Assessment rubric (10 points)
| Criterion | Points | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-lab completed | 1 | notebook check at entry |
| Guided checkpoints | 3 | TA sign-offs during session |
| Independent tasks correct | 3 | code + test evidence |
| Debug task diagnosed (not just fixed) | 2 | debug log with stage + cause |
| Compiles warning-free + naming/format | 1 | build log, file names |
Total 10, scaled to the 10 % course component. Labs 1–15 count the best 12 of 15 (drop-lowest); Lab 16 is graded as the project milestone with the same rubric plus the demo (see the instructor notes).